Beating a Dead Horse
Editorial
Oh
of course, we could drag out the usual experts to help the argument, make
the editorial long winded. Experts like The Wall Street Journal, The Cato
Institute, The Economist Magazine, The Financial Times, and maybe a dozen
economists or two. But why go to the trouble when we can reduce the essence
of our entire monthly editorial to six words? Six words? An editorial
six words long? How can it be?
But we’ve used these same six words before. You’d think they’d
be monotonous, but they’re not—not according to our readers.
Ready or not, our monthly editorial is going to print. The envelope please…
DON’T RAISE TAXES DURING A RECESSION!
Why six words and why every month? Because no matter how many times we
say it, Portland’s business and political leaders just don’t
get it. Talk about monotonous—tax, tax, tax…it’s the
single-word equivalent of this month’s editorial statement in Portland
City Hall, in Multnomah County Chambers and in the Board Rooms of the
city with the highest unemployment rate in the nation. The Mayor, the
City Council, the County Commission, business leaders—all one-trick
ponies. More taxes is the only idea area leaders seem to be able to come
up with. Unfortunately for the tax-and-spenders in Portland, things like
payrolls and income are portable these days.
First they want a new payroll tax and, better yet, now they want a county
personal income tax. That’s our favorite—a county personal
income tax. Why our favorite? Because counties don’t tax personal
income. At least not in Oregon they don’t. Yes, the federal government
taxes personal income, and so do the states, but counties? Leave it to
Multnomah County to think of that one—a personal income tax.
There are eleven states in the nation that actually allow a county or
two to tax personal income. The states are: New York, Ohio, Kentucky,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Michigan, Missouri, Iowa, Indiana, Alabama and
Maryland. Notice geographical similarities here. Only two of those states
are west of the Mississippi (Iowa and Missouri) and none of these states
are west of the nation’s continental divide. So if a personal income
tax was passed in, say, Multnomah County, it would become the first county
west of the Rocky Mountains to tax personal income. How’s that for
being progressive. Things do look different here. Different and Stupid.
Oregon’s largest urban area is making a classic mistake, the same
mistake other large urban areas have made in America over the last 40
years. While Portland officials have tried to claim that the cause of
the destruction of America’s urban areas began with a decline in
schools, they’re wrong. The cause of the destruction of urban areas
in this country always begins with an overreaching government apparatus
growing beyond what residents want or can afford. Increasing taxes to
pay for government’s appetite causes businesses and residents to
flee to the suburbs. The resulting loss of expected revenue causes the
government to increase taxes again, which causes more businesses and residents
to flee, which causes revenues losses, which causes…a vicious circle…which
causes a monthly six word editorial…
DON’T RAISE TAXES DURING A RECESSION!…oops there it is again,
that damn editorial.
If the City, County and business community are successful in their drive
to increase taxes on Multnomah County residents and businesses by $48
million or more, it will be the beginning of the end for Portland as a
viable place to live, work and play. Raising taxes now will not stem the
tide of disaffected residents and businesses headed for the suburbs or
Clark County, Washington. Raising taxes now will only accelerate that
exodus.
When the new business and payroll taxes, and county incomes taxes aren’t
enough to keep up with the appetite for salary and benefit increases in
Portland Public Schools, what’s next for Multnomah County? Neighborhood
personal income taxes? Better not sign up for your local neighborhood
watch—you never know, blink an eye and the Neighborhood Watch might
have taxing authority. Why leave it at your neighborhood, how about the
block you live on? Why not let your own street tax your personal income?
Just kidding…barely.
It would be funny, if it wasn’t so sad. The drama that unfolded
over a potential teacher strike in the Portland Public School District
highlighted a city and county collapsing from within. Now fiscally responsible
liberal/Democrat leader Franscesconi (and sometimes Leonard) is in opposition
and usually losing to city leaders Katz/Sten (and sometimes Leonard) who
insist that the city and county can continue to tax themselves out of
the problem of an ever shrinking revenue base. The Portland Business Alliance
(which has seen its voice badly compromised by accepting more than half
of its operating budget from city coffers and consequently supports every
new proposed tax increase) now has its big business/utility members at
odds with its small business members. More and more, suburban and statewide
business leaders see and understand that Multnomah County leaders just
don’t get the problem and are hopeless to find a solution. And more
and more as Oregonians watch Multnomah County shrink and The Oregonian
cover it with tear drenching/woeful stories, readers around the state
are starting to assert “Why do I care? I don’t have a dog
in this fight, let the county eat its own.” And the businesses…they
keep exiting.
Sorry, we apologize—we reductio ad absurdum there. For that offense,
we sentence ourselves to repeating the only words necessary, our six-word
editorial:
DON’T RAISE TAXES DURING A RECESSION!
BrainstormNW - March 2003
|