|
|
<<HOME | THE
MAGAZINE FOR NORTHWEST DECISION MAKERS |
|
:: Archive: Editorial / November 2008 :: | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
By the time this editorial is published, the November general election will be history. Governor Kulongoski will be serving the final two years of his term and will be ineligible to seek re-election. More than likely he will have Democrats in control of both houses of the legislature. The only real question will be whether the Democrats will have attained “super-majority” status in the House of Representatives (they already have it in the Senate) such that they can pass tax increases without referral to the voters. Kulongoski entered the governor’s office near the end of a recession that began under President Clinton. It was a relatively mild recession nationally and was further softened by President Bush’s tax cuts. Oregon did not fair quite so well. Now Kulongoski is likely to leave office in the middle of another recession begun under President Bush. In contrast, this recession will be much harsher due to the greed on Wall Street, the ineptitude of the current Congress, and the specific intention of Congressional Democrats to let the Bush tax cuts expire, thus raising taxes on individuals, business and capital gains at the very time that we need to pump more money into the economy rather than into government. Oregon entered that first recession before the rest of the nation and trailed the rest of the nation by almost a year in its recovery. By all accounts, Kulongoski’s performance during the first recession would earn him an “F.” The governor’s first reaction was to raise taxes rather than control spending. Twice during that recession Kulongoski supported massive tax increases — the largest in Oregon’s history. Both times the state’s voters turned back those tax increases by overwhelming majorities. In the end, despite soaring rhetoric about prioritizing the state’s needs, Kulongoski allowed the budget to default to across-the-board budget cuts. During the process not a single program was eliminated. Government spending may have dipped slightly, but not a single public employee lost his or her job. The public employee unions proved once again that the intended beneficiaries of public spending come second to their employees and their generous benefits. Beyond that, Kulongoski did little other than appoint blue ribbon commissions whose advice he subsequently ignored. Even as the economy improved nationally, Kulongoski was unable to capitalize on its resurgence or Oregon’s unique status as a gateway to world commerce. Instead he focused on a myriad of “green dreams” and shunned the historic natural resource industries of the state. He kept the state forests locked up. He allowed (some say encouraged) the union organization of growers to the point that they ended their production. He waived goodbye to a succession of large businesses that had their roots in Oregon, including Louisiana Pacific and Freightliner. Forty thousand jobs were lost during that first recession, and while that number was eventually recovered, it was a different mix. Growth in employment came heaviest in government employment and the hospitality business (primarily minimum-wage jobs). Between the beginning of 2007 and the beginning of 2008, Oregon once again lost another 23,000 jobs in manufacturing and construction, and as the recession intensifies, those numbers will grow. The mistakes of the past are most likely to be repeated. Kulongoski is easily the least “economically literate” governor that Oregon has had in modern times. He is a labor lawyer and, except for a brief stint in private practice representing the likes of the public employee unions, he has spent most of his working life as a government official. His principal advisors are former union officials, and he has routinely eschewed advice from his own Council of Economic Advisors. He even sought through an intermediary to intimidate several of them for critical comments made in this magazine. (It is one thing to be ignorant, and it is quite another to be ignorant and clasp your hands over your ears in fear that someone might tell you so.) But, with almost no expectation that Kulongoski will listen, we choose to plow ahead with some practical advice on leadership during this current economic downturn. 1. Cut spending now. Former Gov. John Kitzhaber
deliberately maintained spending at the legislatively approved levels
even though he and the Legislature knew that the revenues were insufficient
to sustain that level of spending. He did it precisely to make the pain
in the final quarters of the biennium more acute so as to bolster his
chances of winning a tax increase. The net result was that the state was
forced to take all of the cuts in the final quarter instead of spreading
them out over a period of six quarters. Let’s not repeat that cynical
strategy. These five simple steps may not provide a total cure for the anticipated $2 billion shortfall for the next biennium, but they will eliminate a substantial portion of the shortfall leaving the governor and the legislature an easier task to prioritize spending on the remaining programs. Five additional suggestions should help prepare Oregon to regain lost ground as the rest of the nation pulls out of the recession: 1. Reduce the capital gains tax by one-half. That
can be done by either reducing the rate or exempting one-half the gain
from state taxation. Every economist worth his/her salt will tell you
that the ability to attract new capital to a state is the touchstone for
future growth. Continuing to treat capital gains as ordinary income is
the antithesis for attracting new capital. There is no better time to
undertake this than during this economic downturn. History taught us that
during the last recession, revenue from taxing capital gains dropped to
near zero simply because there were no gains to tax. The precipitous drop
in the stock market coupled with the recession indicates the same will
be true in this recession. Reducing a tax that produces nearly nothing
will cause little budget pain and will produce a clear signal that Oregon
is once again open for business. Given Gov. Kulongoski’s performance during the last recession, our expectation is that he will respond as he always had — with a series of tax increases. And for two more years Oregonians will watch the continued out-migration of business and good paying jobs. |
|
BRAINSTORMNW
311 B AVENUE, SUITE P LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 |